i  got  ONE NERVE LEFT  and  you're  on  it .

In Memoriam – Bonnie Kuzminski 1949 – 2009 A loving wife, mother and patriot.

(This post will be pinned at the top for a while. Please scroll down for recent posts)

It is with great sadness that I send this message. A dear friend and fellow Northwest Indiana Patriot has passed away. Bonnie Kuzminski was a dedicated mother, wife and patriot who was tireless in her pursuit of freedoms for all of America. She would spend days and nights researching bills, writing news briefs, traveling to protest locations days before an event so as to give the best directions for the rest of us, she donated her time, her resources so that as many people as possible could stay informed on the issues affecting our lives. Although she worked from the background, she was the driving force moving all things forward.

Bonnie was a brilliant writer with a quiet nature combined with a dry sense of humor. Much of this wonderful woman could be seen just below the surface.

Bonnie, my dear friend, we will miss you so very much. I know you are never far, for your new position will guide us from above.

In Memoriam

(From the NWIP website:  http://nwipatriots.com/blog/2009/12/27/in-memoriam/)

The Northwest Indiana Patriots have lost a loved and valuable member of our family.

Bonnie Kuzminski


Read more…

Same Sex Couples Deserve Special Tax Break – Stop Paying for Hetero Marriage – It is Illegal

Lately there has been a push by anti-marriage persons, well, anti- marriage for every one persons, who demand the right to marry is a privileged reserved for a select few. These same people  claim that if same-sex partners are permitted to have their unions recognized, it will cost all of America in the wallet.

I will say that this latest attack on the right to marry is a clever one.  They say that adding same-sex persons to the marriage rolls will increase the cost to the federal bottom line.

This is a very smart move on their part especially when most Americans say that federal spending is out of control. Who wants to add more money to the bottom line by allowing the partnerships between all people be recognized, as opposed to the partnerships of just some (heterosexuals) be recognized.

Here is the news article I refer to and it is titled:  Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBP Says.

First off, that $898M is over 9 years.  That equates to about 10 million a year. Do a little Internet search and you will find out that those costs for equal benefits for same-sex partners is less than what any number of pro athletes get paid for playing sports.

Hummm,  sports players are paid more than it would cost the feds to provide equal benefits to same-sex partnerships. What?

I say that all persons who are involved with or want to be in same-sex partnerships should be given a  deduction on their Federal taxes each year. This line item deduction should be allowed for all persons who are gay. It would balance the amount they currently pay to support heterosexual marriages. All homosexuals should be given a tax break due to the fact that their taxes currently pay for heterosexual privileges, privileges that they will never be able to receive in the form of marriage perks. Their tax break should be in direct relation to what we all pay to support hetero marriages. I am sure the CBO can compute what it costs the federal government to carry heterosexuals and their marriage perks, divide the number of homosexuals into the dollar figure provided as perks paid to married folks and then give a direct rebate/ tax break  to all homosexuals.

It is not fair or reasonable to demand under penalty of law that same-sex persons/homosexuals pay to support a marriage lifestyle, one that they are forbidden by law in enjoying.  The federal government is demanding that homosexuals pay for the perks provided only to heterosexuals.  Therefor, it is illegal for the federal government to demand at the risk of jail that homosexuals pay for services they will never receive. It is illegal for the government to demand payment for services (marriage perks) from all citizens when they have made it illegal for certain citizens to receive those perks.

Hey Republicans, stand up for the constitution and figure out a way to actually represent ALL people, not just your hetero pals.

On that note, I would like for any person to show me where the constitution gives the feds the power to determine what marriage is, define marriage, let alone force persons who they deny marriage to,  be forced to pay for other’s enjoyment of the privilege.

Think of the money all Americans would save, how the bottom line would be reduced if we eliminated all perks given to heterosexual marriages.  Do Away with marriage benefits across the board. If we really are worried about money and how it relates to marriage, eliminate the perks given to all marriages.  The federal government has no business regulating marriages, any marriage.

My position is that the government has no business in regulating marriage, that marriage should be a church issue.  All marriages, being a church issue, have no standing with any local, regional , state or federal government. Marriage is a ceremony that has no significance outside of the church and marriage gains no legal benefits. Marriage is a ceremony and like many other religious ceremonies, has no bearing on a persons legal status.  All perks given to ‘marriage’ by any government are denied as marriage is a religious act and has no bearing on any legalities in this world.

Any persons who desire to have a partnership recognized will be provided a certificate of partnership, or a certificate of union.  Said certificates have no relation to any church. This will allow ‘marriage’ to be defined by any church as they see fit, and marriage will mean nothing socially in terms of being provided special perks provided by any government. People have their religious  ‘marriage’ and people have their ‘contracts’, which have legal binds. The two are separate, not equal, one is discriminatory and has no legal standing (marriage) and the other is not discriminatory and has legal standing.

Bayh gives Indiana a Lump Of Christmas Coal – Votes Yes for Government Healthcare

Hey Evan Bayh, I hope you are not dreaming of a political victory in 2010 and thinking that the people of Indiana will forget what you did to us when you voted YES, twice, to proceed with the federal government taking over 1/6th of our economy which translates into your desire that we do not lead free lives according to the Constitution, that we instead lead lives that are under federal control. Even the average American now knows that you want a socialistic government.

Your comment here, Evan, says it all. You told the NY Times:

Lawmakers who attended a private meeting between Mr. Obama and Senate Democrats at the White House on Tuesday pointed to remarks there by Senator Evan Bayh, Democrat of Indiana, as providing some new inspiration.

Mr. Bayh said that the health care measure was the kind of public policy he had come to Washington to work on, according to officials who attended the session, and that he did not want to see the satisfied looks on the faces of Republican leaders if they succeeded in blocking the measure.

You lied to us Evan Bayh. You lied to us when you took the oath of office to uphold the constitution. When asked why you are doing this to the people of Indiana, voting to enslave us to federal regulation, voting to add federal expenses to the entire state of Indiana, knowing that the people will be punished via higher taxes to pay for your decisions, you claim to be doing what you always wanted to do, expand ‘public policy’ which is a code word for socialism. We are awake now Evan and we now know what you mean when you said that all along you wanted to expand government control over the people, that you desire the people to be powerless and the the feds have ultimate control over every aspect of our lives.
You did not want to see Republicans have a say in this healthcare legislation, let alone see them have any measure of success?  YOU Evan Bayh are playing partisan politics of the worst kind and you are not fit to represent the people of Indiana.  We did NOT elect the Democratic Party, Evan, we elected a PERSON who would represent us.  You vote according to your democratic party and tell the people to screw off. What kind of representative of the people does that?
Evan, the people of Indiana told you to vote NO on healthcare reform.  The country told you to vote NO on healthcare reform and you threw us the finger and voted according to your Party affiliation, completely ignoring the people you swore to represent.  You no longer represent the people of Indiana Evan Bayh, you have always represented you party over the people and in this critical time in US history, you voted to enslave us to the ‘public policy’.  We see who you are now and there is no amount of dancing that you can do between now and 2010 that will erase what we know you to be.

You no longer represent Indiana Evan Bayh. We know now that you have and will continue to vote along your Democratic Party lines, totally ignoring the will of the people.

Yeah, Nancy Pelosi said that they will now have some legislation come through so that you can pretend to vote according to the benefit of Indiana.  You hope that we forget what you did today, selling the freedoms of the people of Indiana down the river because you never had any intention of representing us, especially when it would take a man to stand up to your Party, when it takes a moral representative to listen to the people.

Come 2010 Evan Bayh, I will do something I have never done before. I will walk out my front door and work for a candidate that will represent the people. I will do everything in my power to get you fired.  You are a disgrace to Indiana and there is no amount of kickbacks, earmarks or sugar coated Senate votes that will change my mind. There is no amount of pork (Pork = stealing from us then giving us a dime back on our dollar and then expecting us to say ‘Thank You’) dressed as ‘gifts’ to Indiana that you can trot out that will ever erase what you did today.  Never will we forget what you not only did to the people of Indiana, but to the entire United States of America.

Here is my gift to you Evan, for your enjoyment over the holidays: 

Yeah to Jihad near Ground Zero, they also approve of Clitorectomies

Males that think that muslim dudes are a-okay, because it is just another freedom of religion  thing are telling all women that they believe that the stoning and genital mutilation of females is okay, as along as the males who are doing the killing and mutilation claim that it is religious in nature.

Here is an example of what will happen when muslims have YOUR children under muslim rule.  Remember, muslims do not believe that you have the right  to live unless you convert to muslim.  Under muslim rule, female children have their clitoris chopped off, so that they have no feeling of a sexual nature.

Okay dudes who want Muslims to build near the towers,  those same guys who want America to allow Muslim traditions, okay, lets practice the muslim tradition on YOU.

To effect the same consequence upon males as muslims believe should be done to all females we will do this:

We will take your penis, against your will. We will hold you down or drug you and then find an instrument that we have handy. We will slice then end of your penis off with this blunt instrument, and your bleeding and death is not our concern. We will, while you are held down, we will saw though the tip of your penis.  We will leave you with a nob that you may, or may not be able to urinate through. If you live, you will never experience any pleasure, if you die, who cares.

When it is your dick being sawed off by Muslims will you then pretend to care about what a MUSLIM really is?  What does it take?  It is okay when it is just females, women and girls that are being mutilated and killed and it really doesn’t matter to you, because as a male, these muslim dudes act out what YOU want to do to women?

Again, dude, what is up with all of the woman hatred?  How can any guy want a muslim sect not only at ground zero, but to cover these sick muslim male asses by saying that they are cool and okay because these males act upon a religious mantra.

What the phuck is that all about?  Wake up dudes, this is not some juvenile game here, you are playing with women’s lives.

I don’t have to be a head shrinker to know that anyone who promotes muslim actions is a person who hates women.

Lets be pretty clear, here, muslims hate women. That muslims hate all things female is a given.  If you protect muslims and promote their jihad, want their celebration of American jihad//death to be near`ground zero, well, for all of phucks sake, you hate women and you are not a friend of America. You absolutely can NOT promote the jihad celebration in a building near the twin towers and with a straight mind not know that the muslim jihad is pissing on America with their positioning themselves so near the very sight where they murdered over 3000 people.

How about this, for the dudes that want muslims to be given a parade, given access to law making, given access to creating centers that glorify muslims as they relish the murders they have acted out upon America. Do you even know what a muslim is? What they think?

Needless to say, those males who think that muslims deserve a place next to 9-11, have never had their penis threatened by this muslim cult, so what do they care that muslims kill girls and women?

Your muslim dudes, the ones you want to honor, well, they chop off the genitalia of little girls, teenage women and women.  You see, according to those muslim dudes that you think are so cool, they hate all females. They hates females so much that they take a dull knife to their clit, saw it off, so that no female will ever experience any sensation except for pain when a person touches her vulva. Sex is painful for the rest of the muslim woman’s life.  So painful, some muslim women kill themselves, as they see their lives as meaning nothing under muslim male rule. Are you okay with muslims enough to know that they cut off the genitals of all muslim females?  That is okay with you?  If that doesn’t strike a chord, let’s say that you , as a guy, are held down, and a person takes a piece of glass and saws off the tip of your penis. Do I need to show you the faces of little three year old girls, screaming in pain, as their genitalia is sawn off with a broken piece of glass, all in the name of muslim?

Get it? This is what muslim is all about and if you cannot realize the barbaric nature of muslim then you should not speak of it unless you are asking questions. If you even for a moment promote muslim, you agree that you hate females, as muslim hates all females.

Tell me again why we should respect muslims.  You cannot have it all. Either you respect all humans equally and fight for equality, or you side with the muslims and their barbaric methods of controlling females.  Yeah, you want the woman at home, barefoot, raising the kid, how does that distinguish you from the muslims?  How do your woman hating views, slathered in ’she should stay home and lose her career, be dependent upon another person’ opinions, your thinking that women are baby machines, without feelings, only good for staying home to clean shit out of diapers, how is any of that different than your muslim pals’ views on women?  Where do males draw the lines in this game of power where you claim power over women?  Where are you different?

And you want these muslims dudes to control the world, to have place at the table, to govern the USA, to be respected?  You think it is okay that they laugh at those they have murdered, have a building a block away from the 3000 souls they murdered in 9/11/2001. that muslims maim all females within their reach.

 What is so good about muslim?  Tell me again.  You love your muslim brothers so much, you agree with their hatred`of all females so much that you allow this:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/12/fgm-parties-cutters-flown-in-to-uk-for-clitorectomies.html

Senator Evan Bayh, Socialist, voted YES to Federal Control of The People via Healthcare Reform

Senator Bayh of Indiana is voting ‘yes’ to the federal government takeover of 1/6 of our lives.  Evan Bayh thinks that we, as citizens of Indiana, have no real say in what happens with our lives.  Evan Bayh votes according to what his political party deems is the correct vote. His vote does not reflect the  people of Indiana and he does not care if we are pissed. He no longer represents the people of Indiana.

What this says is that Evan Bayh is no longer a representative of Indiana, his allegiances are with his political party. He became elected by the people of Indiana and then shoved the people that elected him aside because DC politics were more important. He lives for his party, the Democratic Party, because they will now keep him alive, give him money for reelection, but only if he votes according to their rules. He has to abandon the people of Indiana and vote for Democratic Party Rules in order to keep his job (so he thinks).  So, he places votes that say YES to federal government control over the lives of the citizens of Indiana.  And he has no reservations regarding his decisions, because his Party has told him they will now spend money for his election in 2010.

Where is the honor when a person runs for office upon the principle of honesty and a commitment to honor the people’s wishes and then that same person says, “Fooled Ya!”, I am voting according to how Pelosi tells me to vote, the people of Indiana be damned?

I thought that the constitution allowed for the people to vote for representatives that would defend the people against a singular political party ruling the entire United States of America.  WE vote for representatives (Bayh) who we thought would stand up for us and defend us against a monocular political party. When we elected Bayh he was to deliver the demands and wishes of the people of Indiana to the highest office granted by the constitution.

Bayh abandoned us in favor of his Democratic Party.  He maybe never actually served us, but merely placated certain concerns so as to build a resume for reelection. We see now what his real  alliances lay with his Democratic Party and that the people of Indiana have no real say in his actions. He believes that in a few short months, in Nov. of 2010, most of Indiana will have forgotten his betrayal.

Now we learn that our elected officials are NOT governing for the people, they are making decisions based upon some political party.

This just sucks and we need to get Bayh out of office and make sure that we ask the questions of any potential elected official that makes us know that she or he will actually work on behalf of the people of the state of Indiana. Bayh lied to us and is now showing us he doesn’t give a flip what we think.  He thinks that come late 2010 we will have forgotten what he did to us today.
Principle over party is my mantra. I refuse to vote for a person just because of their political party. I will vote for principles.

Party over principle means that a dude like Bayh says whatever he needs to say to get elected, but that he is already in the mainline of party politics. The political party gives him money to fund a campaign, he in turn has to vote as they need him to vote, or else they withhold his reelection support.

My principles, knowing that Evan Bayh is a snake of a politician, will say whatever he thinks he needs to say, says to me ,that Bayh is NOT a good representative of Indiana come 2010.

So, when it comes to his voting for socialism, voting YES on socialistic health care, he does not care that people call him , ask him to consider that Indiana does NOT want this health care bill, he only cares about gaining favor with his POLITICAL PARTY. So he votes according to what the democrats want him to vote and he IGNORES what the people of Indiana are saying.

You want Evan Bayh Again?  Or do you want a person who will do what they were elected to do and that is to follow the will of the people? Evan Bayh no longer follows the will of the people.

Did you vote for a Political Party, or did you vote for a person that would represent you?

Well, in regards to Evan Bayh, with his socialist views, he does not care what you think, what the people of Indiana think, he is going to vote for the socialists democratic bills such as Healthcare Reform and he does not care what you think.

The people of Indiana do not float his boat. He is in congress now and his political Party floats his boat.

Time to vote his boat OUT.

Time to find a honest politician.

Call Bayh now, tell him what you think. Leave a message on his answering machine at:

Tell him NO on this Healthcare Reform bill.

We deserve better.

His numbers to call are:

DC: 202- 224-5623

or his Indiana office : 219-852-2763

Climate Change Hidden Decline – The Hoax of Global Warming

Obama and his minions are trying to push down the discovery that the Climate Change, Global Warning science is not as settled as they want us to believe. Obama’s mouthpiece, Gibbs said, “The science is settled” even as leaked emails from scientists were aired and it was shown that global warming was a fabricated hoax. I guess they think that if they tell America that ‘It’s Settled’, that we are to just blindly believe the federal government, regardless of the data that shows that they are lying to us.

If Americans buy into global warming then Obama is one step closer to putting another piece of One World Order in place.  This positions the USA as just another country that is governed by world leaders, which I believe Obama is campaigning to be., the leader of the World.  Considering that Obama has dubious hidden history, that his life is one of gaining position through the help of others not necessarily on talent, considering that he has spent most of his adult life campaigning for a higher office, it is no wonder that after being POTUS he would seek to be the grand leader of the world.

His bowing to other leaders, his apologizing for America, positioning the United States of America as being ‘no better or different’ than any other country sets up his campaign. He holds no allegiance to the USA, there is even a question regarding his being a Natural Born Citizen.  Being Natural Born is different that being naturalized and only a Natural Born can be President. He has spent close to 2 million dollars to hide his birth records. We can only guess that when someone goes to those lengths to hide something, well, there is some truth to what some are saying, in that he is not legally allowed to hold the office of President.

Now we have climate change and I ask you to read this article by Marc Sheppard.  Marc actually delivers the most clear explanation of what happened and what this ‘hide the decline’ / global warming, really means.

Pass it along. People should have a better understand of what a hoax global warming is and why it was created. The bottom line is that the global warming/climate change hoax is a way for one more piece of world rule to be put in place.

What a shame that the socialists have shaped our school system, created reading material, directed the teachings of the public school system and now we have a generation of children raised on a lie.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/understanding_climategates_hid.html

Understanding Climategate’s Hidden Decline

By Marc Sheppard

Close followers of the Climategate controversy know that much of the mêlée surrounds an e-mail in which Climate Research Unit (CRU) chief Phil Jones wrote about using “Mike’s Nature Trick” (MNT) to “hide the decline.” And yet, seventeen days and thousands of almost exclusively on-line op-eds into this scandal, it still seems that very few understand exactly which “decline” was being hidden, what “trick” was used to do so, and why Jones’s words have become the slogan for the greatest scientific fraud in history.

As the mainstream media move from abject denial to dismissive whitewashing, CRU co-conspirators move to Copenhagen for tomorrow’s U.N. climate meeting, intent on changing the world as we know it based primarily on their now-exposed trickery. Add yesterday’s announcement of a U.N. investigation into the matter, which will doubtless be no less corrupt than those being investigated, and public awareness of how and why that trick was performed is now more vital than ever.
So please allow me to explain in what I hope are easily digestible terms.
First and foremost — contrary to what you’ve likely read elsewhere in the blogosphere or heard from the few policymakers and pundits actually addressing the issue, it was not the temperature decline the planet has been experiencing since 1998 that Jones and friends conspired to hide. Certainly, the simple fact that the e-mail was sent in November of 1999 should allay any such confusion.
In fact, the decline Jones so urgently sought to hide was not one of measured temperatures at all, but rather figures infinitely more important to climate alarmists — those determined by proxy reconstructions. As this scandal has attracted new readers to the subject, I ask climate-savvy readers to indulge me while I briefly explain climate proxies, as they are an essential ingredient of this contemptible conspiracy.
Truth be told, even reasonably reliable instrumental readings are a relatively modern convenience, limiting CRU’s global measured temperature database to a start date somewhere in the mid-19th century. That’s why global temperature charts based on actual readings typically use a base year of 1850, or somewhere thereabout.
And yet, most historical temperature charts, including the one Al Gore preached before in An Inconvenient Truth, go way back to 1000 AD. That’s where proxies come in.

Read the rest of the article here. You have to read the entire article to understand the data manipulation and how they switched data boats in midstream in order to make the warming  trend play out.  As of today, evidently the Russians admit that they falsely created much of the data to support a global warming.

Folks, when Obama pushed Cap and Trade on us, remember that all of the data used as a foundation for this power and money grab is suspect and that Cap and Trade is a way for Obama to position himself as a global leader at the expense of the USA. The cap and trade legislation is  a tax hike on 95% of America. It is a vehicle for ruining America and enslaving the USA to World Leaders.

Letter to Obama – Shape up or Ship Out

Please read and pass on: (h/t to The Dame Truth)

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now.

He dictated this letter  to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year.  People meeting me for the first time don’t believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos’n Mate.  Now I live in a “rest home” located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can’t figure out what country you are the president of.

You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

” We’re no longer a Christian nation”

” America is arrogant” – (Your wife even

announced to the world,”America is mean-

spirited. ” Please tell her to try preaching

that nonsense to 23 generations of our

war dead buried all over the globe who

died for no other reason than to free a

whole lot of strangers from tyranny and

hopelessness.)

I’d say shame on the both of you, but I don’t think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you.  To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said,” America hasn’t lived up to her ideals.”

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?  Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?  I hope you didn’t mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don’t think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination.  You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American.  If you don’t, I’ll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue.  You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don’t want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts, who was putting up a fight?  You don’t mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don’t want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing.  I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you’re the Commander-in-Chief now, son.  Do your job.  When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him.  But if you’re not in this fight to win, then get out.  The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you’re thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.

You’re not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy.  That’s not our greatest threat.  Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don’t want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle.

Sincerely,

Harold B. Estes

When a 95 year old hero of the “the Greatest Generation”

stands up and speaks out like this, I think we owe it

to him to send his words to as many Americans as

we can. Please pass it on.

The Wilding of Sarah Palin. Women, War, Politics, Rape and the Hatred of Women

Below is a copy of a post by Robin of Berkley which touches on how males use the rape of women as a war tactic.

Women should understand these tactics discussed in the article below, learn them and battle back. Women must stop believing the Democrats will take care of you, stop thinking that NOW and the Feminist Majority represent all women and know that the women involved with those two groups are socialists who are selling America down the river. The democrats have been promising change for women for over 50 years. Why are you waiting on the liberals, who opine for socialism, to give you ‘equality’. It ain’t happenin’. You have been sold a bill of goods, been bamboozled, used, abused and left at the alter. Stop falling for the democratic/liberal tom-trickery.


The Wilding of Sarah Palin by Robin of Berkley

When I was in college, I read a book that changed my life. It was Susan Brownmiller’s tome, Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape, which explained rape as an act of power instead of just lust. What I found particularly chilling was the chapter on war — how rape is used to terrorize a population and destroy the enemy’s spirit.

While edifying, the book magnified the vulnerability I already felt as a female. Fear of rape became a constant dread, and I sought a solution that would help shield me from danger.

The answer: seek safe harbor within the Democratic Party. I even became an activist for feminist causes, including violence against women. Liberalism would protect me from the big, bad conservatives who wished me harm.

Like for most feminists, it was a no-brainer for me to become a Democrat. Liberal men, not conservatives, were the ones devoted to women’s issues. They marched at my side in support of abortion rights. They were enthusiastic about women succeeding in the workplace.

As time went on, I had many experiences that should have made me rethink my certainty. But I remained nestled in cognitive dissonance — therapy jargon for not wanting to see what I didn’t want to see.

One clue: the miscreants who were brutalizing me didn’t exactly look Reagan-esque. In middle and high schools, they were minority kids enraged about forced busing. On the streets of New York City and Berkeley, they were derelicts and hoodlums

Another red flag: while liberal men did indeed hold up those picket signs, they didn’t do anything else to protect me. In fact, their social programs enabled bad behavior and bred chaos in urban America. And when I was accosted by thugs, those leftist men were missing in action.

What else should have tipped me off? Perhaps the fact that so many men in ultra-left Berkeley are sleazebags. Rarely a week goes by that I don’t hear stories from my young female clients about middle-aged men preying on them. With the rationale of moral relativism, these creeps feel they can do anything they please. 

What finally woke me up were the utterances of “bitch,” “witch,” and “monster” toward Hillary Clinton and her supporters early last year. I was shocked into reality: the trash-talk wasn’t coming from conservatives, but from male and female liberals.   

I finally beheld what my eyes had refused to see: that leftists are Mr. and Ms. Misogyny. Neither the males nor the females care a whit about women.

Women are continually sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. If under radical Islam women are enshrouded and stoned and beheaded, so be it. 

My other epiphanies: those ponytailed guys were marching for abortion rights not because they cherished women’s reproductive freedom, but to keep women available for free and easy sex.  

And the eagerness for women to make good money? If women work hard, leftist men don’t have to.  

Then along came Sarah, and the attacks became particularly heinous. And I realized something even more chilling about the Left. Leftists not only sacrifice and disrespect women, but it’s far worse: many are perpetuators.

The Left’s behavior towards Palin is not politics as usual. By their laser-focus on her body and her sexuality, leftists are defiling her. 

They are wilding her. And they do this with the full knowledge and complicity of the White House.

The Left has declared war on Palin because she threatens their existence. Liberals need women dependent and scared so that women, like blacks, will vote Democrat. 

A strong, self-sufficient woman, Palin eschews liberal protection. Drop her off in the Alaskan bush and she’ll survive just fine, thank you very much. Palin doesn’t need or want anything from liberals — not hate crimes legislation that coddles her, and not abortion, which she abhors.

Palin is a woman of deep and abiding faith. She takes no marching orders from messiah-like wannabes like Obama. 

And so the Left must try to destroy her. And they are doing this in the most malicious of ways: by symbolically raping her.
Just like a perpetuator, they dehumanize her by objectifying her body. They undress her with their eyes.

They turn her into a piece of ass.

Liberals do this by calling her a c__t,  ogling her legs, demeaning her with names like “slutty flight attendant” and “Trailer Park Barbie,” and exposing her flesh on the cover of Newsweek.

Nothing is off-limits, not actress Sandra Bernhard’s wish that Palin be gang-raped or the sexualization of Palin’s daughters.

As every woman knows, leering looks, lurid words, and veiled threats are intended to evoke terror. Sexual violence is a form of terrorism. 

The American Left has a long history of defiling people to control and break them. The hard core ’60s leftists were masters of guerrilla warfare, like the Symbionese Liberation Army repeatedly raping Patty Hearst. Huey P. Newton sent a male Black Panther to the hospital, bloodied and damaged from a punishment of sodomy.  

The extreme Left still consider themselves warriors, righteous soldiers for their Marxist cause. With Palin, they use sexual violence as part of their military arsenal.

Palin is not the only intended victim. As Against Our Will described, the brutality is also aimed at men. By forcing men to witness Palin’s violation, the Left tries to emasculate conservative men and render them powerless. 

The wilding of any woman is reprehensible. But defiling a mother of five with a babe in her arms, and a grandmother to boot, is particularly obscene. It is, of course, Palin’s unapologetic motherhood that fuels the leftist fire.

Because as a mother and a fertile woman, Palin is as close to the sacred as a person gets. She is not just politically pro-life. Her whole being emanates life, which is a stark contrast to the darkness of the Left, the life-despoilers.  

These “progressives” are so alienated from the sacred that they perceive nothing as sacred. And they will destroy anyone whose goodness shines a mirror on their pathology. The spiritually barren must annihilate the vital and the fertile.

It has been almost two years since I woke up and broke up with liberalism. During these many months, I’ve discovered that everything I believed was wrong.

But the biggest shock of all has been realizing that the Democratic Party is hardly an oasis for women. Now that it has been infiltrated by the hard Left, it’s a dangerous place for women, children, and other living things. 

In the wilding of Sarah Palin, the Left shows its true colors. Rather than sheild the vulnerable, leftists will mow down any man, woman, or child who gets in their way. Instead of a movement of hope and change, it is a cauldron of hate.

From Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Hatred paralyzes life; love releases it. Hatred confuses life; love harmonizes it. Hatred darkens life; love illuminates it.

In these dark times, with spiritually bankrupt people at the helm, thank God we have bright lights like Sarah Palin to illuminate the darkness. 

A frequent AT contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist and a recovering liberal in Berkeley.

Congressman admits that Congress could care less about the Constitution

We sit here wondering outloud, “What are they doing in DC? Where in the Consittution do they have the power to pass this (insert any legislation that gives the Feds more power and control over the People).

Watch Judge Napolintano describe his conversation with Rep James Clyburn, a democrat from South Carolina.

Now you understand the size of the job we have in front of us and the years it will take to restore the Republic of America. We have to VOTE THEM OUT, ignore party lines and select and elect persons who are willing to work toward a constitutional state.

Climate Change Crisis is a Lie , Cap and Trade is a Scam

Many people acknowledge that Cap & Trade is a scam, a rouse to benefit big business and more importantly serve as a governmental power grab. More and more folks are waking up and realizing that the current administration is all about power over the people, be that a grab for federal control of our health care, a grab for businesses ( taxing businesses out of existence and creating larger unemployment roles), a grab for industry, (US Gov buying auto companies as one example), and a grab for control of our resources via the ‘Climate Change Crisis ‘ which morphs into Cap and Trade legislation. All of this is designed to move the USA closer to a one world order. The Obama Apology Tour was designed to give the impression to the world that Obama thinks America sucks and that we are no different or better than any other country. Therefore, when the boys nominate a World Leader, Obama can be viewed as holding no allegiance to any country especially the United States of America.

These boys do not dream up these plans and actions overnight. It takes years and years of little pieces flowing together to make the big picture, to create the foundation of their new assault on America.

The climate on Earth has been changing since G*d made dirt. That is a fact. But, and this is a big but, the guys in power plotted and  facilitated a way to make our naturally occurring climate a crisis. Do not forget that the Obama administration said, “Never waste a good crisis.”  So, in  creating a climate crisis, this latest crisis became another vehicle for installing greater  federal government control over the people. ‘People’ in this case refers to the great unwashed masses in America and around the world who are too stupid to see past the Obama smoke and mirrors.

The scientists who were in on this climate change ruse dumped the data that was and is the foundation of their claims. This is The Dog Ate My Homework defense on a global scale.

Climate Change Scientists Admit Dumping Data combined with a man who years ago tried to tell the world that this climate change research was skewed but was silenced in the world of science. The emails say that they are going to do just that. They were and did not allow papers to be published that were contrary to the climate crisis they were selling.

Scientists at the University of East
Anglia have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on
which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations
said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

Then you have Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change saying basically that a few dudes who may have emailed each other, who actively manipulated the data and the peer reviews of dissenting research, disallowed any scientific data that pointed to NO climate change crisis says:

There is “virtually no possibility” of a few scientists biasing the
advice given to governments by the UN’s top global warming body, its
chair said today.

Rajendra Pachauri defended the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
in the wake of apparent suggestions in emails between climate
scientists at the University of East Anglia that they had prevented
work they did not agree with from being included in the panel’s fourth
assessment report, which was published in 2007.

The emails were made public this month after a hacker illegally obtained them from servers at the university.

Pachauri
said the large number of contributors and rigorous peer review
mechanism adopted by the IPCC meant that any bias would be rapidly
uncovered.

“The processes in the IPCC are so robust, so
inclusive, that even if an author or two has a particular bias it is
completely unlikely that bias will find its way into the IPCC report,”
he said.

“Every single comment that an expert reviewer provides
has to be answered either by acceptance of the comment, or if it is not
accepted, the reasons have to be clearly specified. So I think it is a
very transparent, a very comprehensive process which insures that even
if someone wants to leave out a piece of peer reviewed literature there
is virtually no possibility of that happening.”

Obama and the guys around the world who need a climate change crisis, created a climate change crisis are scrambling now to recover from the light being brought to their dark plan. They are rushing now to  pull the curtain over the goings on, the faked crisis.  The emails that were discovered, the emails that showed that this claimate crisis is fabricated are being brushed under the rug.  Obama’s Pravda, NBC, ABC, CNN, CBS are not even covering climategate, just like they barely mentioned Acorngate or any other piece of factual revelations which indicates that Obama is setting the USA up for a major reaming.

Remember when Obama was going to attend,  then was not going,  then IS going to attend Copenhagen for the United Nations climate talk? Well, ahead of the trip and right after this Climategate, Obama announced a major commitment to cutting greenhouse gases. Obama wants to enter the USA into an international treaty over climate concerns which would effectively undermine and fracture our constitution. This meeting in Denmark is one step toward that goal.

You can read more about Copenhagen, Denmark and the climate summit here.

The leaked emails muddy the waters.

President Obama faces no easy task in uniting dozens of bickering nations toward the goal of tackling climate change at an international conference in Copenhagen next week. But as if that weren’t hard enough, a slew of leaked e-mails in the run-up to the conference has only fueled global warming skeptics who say the cause is bunk.

The president announced last week that he would attend the United Nations meeting, in a bid to drive some manner of agreement to set new greenhouse gas emissions targets — though a legally binding deal is unlikely.

But shortly before his announcement, hackers broke into the servers at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in Great Britain and posted e-mails in which scientists dismissed climate change skeptics, expressed concern about the lack of evidence to prove the threat of global warming and even made one reference to a plan to “hide the decline” in temperatures.

The president’s climate czar, former EPA administrator Carol Browner, said she’s sticking with scientists who believe in man’s impact on global warming. And the White House is also shrugging off the e-mails.

“I think there’s no real scientific basis for the dispute of this,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.

Yeah, skew the data and base a global political position on that data, lose and destroy the data but maintain that it is real, cause you say so, prevent the scientific data from all contributors from being published, only present the data you need to back up your claim (lose that data) then still say that you ‘believe in science. The science is settled’.

Something is rotten in Denmark folks.