Northwest Indiana Patriots, i got One Nerve Left
i  got  ONE NERVE LEFT  and  you're  on  it .

Male rapist murderer transferred to Women’s Prison – he claims to be a woman

This is the kind of BS that slips right on past main stream America. We have a male, a RAPIST who claims to be a woman and has now, through the legal system, been granted to a transfer to a woman’s prison.

Mind you, the women at the prison have no say in this and you can bet your bottom dollar that it is mainly males/men deciding that they will place a male, a rapist in their midst. Don’t even think about the position women are being put in by having a male rapist in close quarters, in their bedrooms, in their showers.

This whole ‘transsexual thing has to be exposed for what it is. It is a mental disorder, a psychological disorder.  You can no more change sex than you can turn a dog into a cat. Biology is biology, so there  is no such thing as a ‘ trans-sexual’ in a reality based world. You cannot become a female if you are male.  It is biologically impossible.

Why are we, as a global society, allowing these males to determine what a woman is and then legally granting a male the desired ‘identity’ as a woman, as a female?

This has gone on too long and it has gone too far. The transgender movement attached themselves to gay people and now there is the ‘GLBT’ moniker which is repulsive. Transgendered persons are mentally ill and have nothing to do with the ‘GLB’ sexual orientation group.  Get that ‘T’ off the ‘GLB’ if you are going to do anything. Stop any EDNA bill that has anything to do with any transgender issue and make these men own up to their mental illness and get help for their condition. Stop coddling them by saying “Oh, sure you are a woman, you are a woman trapped in a male’s body.” That is pure bullshit and these guys need to stop trying to force men into women’s lives via this fantasy ’sex change’.

Article is below, bold parts are mine. I have commented within the article, but really, this is such bullshit and I have so much to say, you would not recognize the article if I said all that I wanted to say.

Be it enough to ask everyone to stop with all of this transgender stuff as if it is real. The only real part of that transgender group is that they have a mental aliment and need help.  THAT is what society should address, helping them with their illness,  not giving them methods to carry out their sick fantasy of ‘changing sex’. Males cannot ever be female, so stop playing into their hand, stop enabling their  fantasy. This is just nuts. Now the doods have placed a rapist, a man, in close quarters with women in a women’s prison. NUTS! And don’t tell me that just because he murdered a male he should do just fine in a women’s prision. He is a rapist and a murderer and usually people who are capable of those acts are equal opportunity shits.

They are worried because this guy has it rough in a men’s prison and can’t wear women’s clothing without being harassed.  Big effin deal.  I guess it makes sense to think only about this one male and what he wants so that is why you put him in a WOMEN”S PRISON?

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6822127.ece

Transsexual killer wins battle to serve life sentence in a women’s jail

A transsexual killer who was born a man has won a legal battle to be transferred to a women’s prison.

The prisoner, who was also convicted of attempted rape, will be moved to a women’s jail within weeks after a High Court ruled that the refusal by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, to transfer her  [this is NOT a 'her', this is a HE who is a rapist and a murderer] violated her basic human rights and increased her long-term risk to society.

The prisoner is in her 20s and serving a life sentence for manslaughter and attempted rape.

She has had her womanhood recognised by law and her birth certificate has been amended accordingly, [We need to make sure that NO birth certificate can ever be altered at the whim of any male with a mental illnes who fancies himself to be 'female'] the High Court in London was told. She has had hair on her face and legs permanently removed by laser and has developed breasts after hormone treatment, but is forbidden from wearing skirts or blouses, or more than “subtle” make up, at the men’s prison where she is held on a wing for vulnerable prisoners.

Describing her as “a woman trapped inside a man’s body”, her barrister, Phillipa Kaufman, said the final step to her achieving full womanhood is gender reassignment surgery – but she had been told she cannot have it while in a men’s prison.{So being female, being a woman is something men decide in their courts. THEY decide that they can birth a female from a male vis surgery and hormone, hair removal and feminine clothing.  Sheesh, thanks guys.]

Doctors have refused even to consider her for the operation unless she fulfills the “living role requirement” – living as a woman for an extended period; so she has no hope of getting the surgery she so desperately wants unless moved to a women’s jail.

The barrister told Judge David Elvin, QC, that, although the woman has now served her minimum jail term, she has been told by the Parole Board that she remains an unnacceptable risk to the public, still has “a great deal of work to do” and is “nowhere near release”.

That, Miss Kaufman argued, was a direct result of her intense frustration at being unable to have gender reassignment surgery.

The prisoner, dressed in a dark blue blouse  and striped jacket and wearing gold earrings, listened by video link as Miss Kaufman told the judge: “At the moment, she lives as a woman amongst men on a vulnerable prisoners’ unit and she can’t wear what she wants or more than subtle make up. They are an important statement of her femaleness.” [Oh FFS, THIS is what a woman is, earrings, skirts, tits and makeup?]

Oliver Sanders, for the Justice Department and the prison authorities, argued that the woman would be no more likely to be accepted by inmates at a female prison and that, if moved, she would have to spend long periods in segregation, at an extra cost of £80,000 per year.

But today Judge Elvin ruled that the Justice Department’s refusal to transfer her to a women’s jail amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which enshrines the right to respect for privacy.

Regardless of any extra cost involved, the judge said that to block her progress towards full gender reassignment surgery was irrational and would only increase her risk to the public.

After the judge’s ruling, Miss Kaufman told the judge that the woman is now expected to be moved to a women’s jail within a few weeks.

The transsexual prisoner, referred to in court only as “A”, was convicted of manslaughter and jailed for five years after smothering her boyfriend with a pillow and strangling him with a pair of tights.

Her life sentence tariff, the minimum period she must serve before being considered for parole, expired in 2007. “A” was diagnosed as suffering from gender dysphoria and had been aware of her condition from an early age, the judge said.

The woman said in her evidence that when her gender was legally recognised it was “a reflection of how it should have been from the start”.

The judge said that her detention in a men’s jail had both scotched her desire to live fully “in role” as a woman – and thus qualify for a full gender reassignment – and had also had a “serious adverse effect” on her ability to take part in work aimed at reducing her risk status and moving towards release.

The judge issued a mandatory order requiring Mr Straw to transfer “A” to a women’s prison.

.

The prisoner, who was also convicted of attempted rape, will be moved to a women’s jail within weeks after a High Court ruled that the refusal by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, to transfer her violated her basic human rights and increased her long-term risk to society.

The prisoner is in her 20s and serving a life sentence for manslaughter and attempted rape.

She has had her womanhood recognised by law and her birth certificate has been amended accordingly, the High Court in London was told. She has had hair on her face and legs permanently removed by laser and has developed breasts after hormone treatment, but is forbidden from wearing skirts or blouses, or more than “subtle” make up, at the men’s prison where she is held on a wing for vulnerable prisoners.

Describing her as “a woman trapped inside a man’s body”, her barrister, Phillipa Kaufman, said the final step to her achieving full womanhood is gender reassignment surgery – but she had been told she cannot have it while in a men’s prison.

Doctors have refused even to consider her for the operation unless she fulfills the “living role requirement” – living as a woman for an extended period; so she has no hope of getting the surgery she so desperately wants unless moved to a women’s jail.

The barrister told Judge David Elvin, QC, that, although the woman has now served her minimum jail term, she has been told by the Parole Board that she remains an unnacceptable risk to the public, still has “a great deal of work to do” and is “nowhere near release”.

That, Miss Kaufman argued, was a direct result of her intense frustration at being unable to have gender reassignment surgery.

The prisoner, dressed in a dark blue blouse and striped jacket and wearing gold earrings, listened by video link as Miss Kaufman told the judge: “At the moment, she lives as a woman amongst men on a vulnerable prisoners’ unit and she can’t wear what she wants or more than subtle make up. They are an important statement of her femaleness.”

Oliver Sanders, for the Justice Department and the prison authorities, argued that the woman would be no more likely to be accepted by inmates at a female prison and that, if moved, she would have to spend long periods in segregation, at an extra cost of £80,000 per year.

But today Judge Elvin ruled that the Justice Department’s refusal to transfer her to a women’s jail amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which enshrines the right to respect for privacy.

Regardless of any extra cost involved, the judge said that to block her progress towards full gender reassignment surgery was irrational and would only increase her risk to the public.

After the judge’s ruling, Miss Kaufman told the judge that the woman is now expected to be moved to a women’s jail within a few weeks.

The transsexual prisoner, referred to in court only as “A”, was convicted of manslaughter and jailed for five years after smothering her boyfriend with a pillow and strangling him with a pair of tights.

Her life sentence tariff, the minimum period she must serve before being considered for parole, expired in 2007. “A” was diagnosed as suffering from gender dysphoria and had been aware of her condition from an early age, the judge said.

The woman said in her evidence that when her gender was legally recognised it was “a reflection of how it should have been from the start”.

The judge said that her detention in a men’s jail had both scotched her desire to live fully “in role” as a woman – and thus qualify for a full gender reassignment – and had also had a “serious adverse effect” on her ability to take part in work aimed at reducing her risk status and moving towards release.

The judge issued a mandatory order requiring Mr Straw to transfer “A” to a women’s prison.

Related posts:

  1. Obama Appoints a Transgender to Commerce Department – Psst – The is no such thing as a ’sex’ change
  2. The Wilding of Sarah Palin. Women, War, Politics, Rape and the Hatred of Women
  3. Michelle Obama really cares about women and Healthcare. Oh really?

Comments are closed.